On 07-08-2014 13:01, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> I didn't understand this sentence. Packages in one section deponds on >> packages on other section. > > Basically, the same as last time. OK. > >>> >>> The August 15 date may slip. I am anticipating a new release of glibc >>> any time now and would like to get it into the books, but we won't know >>> the actual release date until it happens. I also anticipate version >>> 3.16 of the kernel by that date, but I don't see that version as >>> critical. >> >> I have asked this before. I would like to have an rc1 for BLFS, so >> packages could be updated in svn, during the freeze time of BLFS-rc1. It >> took more than a month of intense work to catch up the lost time, for >> 7.5 release (IIRC). > > I could do this, but it means that packages need to be updated in both > -rc1 and trunk. That is, if we mark a package that is tested for 7.6 in > -rc1, then we need to do it in svn too. Is that what would like to do? > > Typically -rc releases don't change. Yes, I was thinking in creating an rc1 branch, separated from svn. While fixing rc1, at least some packages, e.g the fastest ones to build, could be updated, still, rc1 would stay frozen. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
