On 10/02/2014 07:11 PM, David Brodie wrote:
> On 02/10/14 17:14, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> Thanks, David. Very important, I needed to modify some packages.
>>
>> I found:
>>
>> gnome-system-monitor-3.14.0/ChangeLog: Drop gnome-icon-theme dependency
>
> Fair enough.
>
>> Thunar 1.6.3:
>> {{{
>> commit 8f7a02c162880e48891ea5528e3513d71ef6105f
>> Author: Jannis Pohlmann <[email protected]>
>> Date: Wed Jan 26 23:17:18 2011 +0100
>>
>> Ship stock_folder-{copy,move}.png with Thunar itself (bug #6851).
>>
>> These icons were part of older gnome-icon-theme releases but have
>> now
>> disappeared. There are no useful equivalents in the icon naming
>> specification or the GTK+ stock icons (well, there is
>> GTK_STOCK_COPY,
>> but no appropriate replacement for "stock_folder-move"), so for now
>> it's
>> best to ship the icons ourselves, I think.
>> }}}
>
> I think Thunar still has a run-time dependency on gnome-icon-theme -
> it's just not checked for in the configure script. For example, try
> renaming /usr/share/icons/gnome and then trying to view a folder as
> icons. Jannis's commit message seems to be about replacing some icons
> which *used* to be in g-i-t with his own copies, not about dropping
> g-i-t altogether. (At least, that's how I read it.)
>
> DavidI suppose it could use any icon theme that has a similar icon set, be it gnome, adwaita, oxygen, etc icon theme. I remember using tango-icon-theme with Xfce4 in the past too. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
