On 01-12-2014 07:18, Christopher Gregory wrote: > On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 07:07 -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> On 01-12-2014 02:36, Christopher Gregory wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This was proposed a while back but we did not reach a conclusion on it >>> as some packages within gnome seemed to still need them. >> >> It was not within gnome. >> >>> >>> This time around I deliberately did not install these packages: >>> >>> gnome-icon-theme-3.12.0 >>> gnome-icon-theme-extras-3.12.0 >>> gnome-icon-theme-symbolic-3.12.0 >>> >>> After installing the full gnome desktop nothing complained about these >>> packages missing during compilation and from what I can tell no icons >>> are missing because these packages were not installed. >> >> Again, it was not gnome. >> >>> >>> I suspect that anything that has these as a dependency could have them >>> replaced by gnome-themes-standard-3.14.2.2. >> >> I suspect not. >> >>> I am about to go through the nightmare of changing the systemd branch >>> now that I know for sure that it will not break the build. >>> >>> Anything that makes use of these three packages outside of the gnome >>> environment may well be able to use the gnome-themes-standard or >>> adwaita-icon-theme instead. >> >> This not true. IIRC, David was the one who told this. I took dome time >> for me to test what he said, I still can demonstrate in my system, >> because they all are installed now. Problem is related to som being >> dependent of gtk+2 (gnome-icon-theme) others, gtk+3 (adwaita-icon-theme). >> >> The following packages need gnome-icon-theme-3.12.0 and some, if not >> all, do not work with adwaita: >> >> xsoft/other/ekiga.xml: <xref linkend="gnome-icon-theme"/> >> xfce/core/thunar.xml: <xref linkend="gnome-icon-theme"/> >> xfce/core/xfce4-settings.xml: <xref linkend="gnome-icon-theme"/> >> >> Please, search the archives. This was discussed, and we do have reached >> a conclusion of not removing them. Unless you demonstrate that your >> suspicions for replacement work. >> >> -- >> []s, >> Fernando > > Fine forget I said anything. I also know for a FACT of another package > that does not work with current instructions but I will leave that for > you to find out the hard way.
I don't understand at all your reply, sorry. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
