Le 01/12/2014 18:16, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> Le 01/12/2014 11:37, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
>>> Le 01/12/2014 04:11, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Let's say you are on machine A and want to run qemu (virtual system
>>>> C) on machine B.  If you want to ssh into the qemu system, how do the
>>>> network packets get forwarded from A to C? The only way I could see
>>>> to do that is via a bridge on B that has both the ip addresses for B
>>>> and C.
>>>>
>>> Use port forwarding:
>>>
>>> launch qemu (on machine B) with:
>>> -net user,vlan=0,hostfwd=tcp::2222-10.0.2.9:22
>>> (this needs the VM to be configured with a static IP, 10.0.2.9 in this
>>> example)
>>>
>>> then use ssh <user>@<B address or B name> -p 2222 (on machine A)
>>>
>>> where <user> is username on C machine. You can change 2222 to any
>>> value above 1024, which is not in use on your computer.
>>
>> Just to be clear : if you change 2222 to something else, it has to be
>> done both in the "-net user" line and the "-p" option
> 
> I had not considered ssh port forwarding, but the bridge technique is still
> valid.  The way I do it is to add the IP for C to A's (and B's) /etc/hosts
> file and then connecting is as easy as 'ssh C' from either system.
> 
> Using port forwarding a user can always create an alias or script on A and B
> to connect to C with a simple command.  The port forwarding has the advantage
> of not needing to be run as root (or setting capabilities on /sbin/ip and
> /usr/sbin/brctl).
> 
> I think this amounts to a preference, however using port forwarding is
> instructive (as is the bridge example).
> 
> Should we add port forwarding as an alternative to the qemu configuration?
> 

If I am allowed to comment on this without being accused of all crimes on
Earth, I'd agree that it may be a good idea to have both methods on the page
(the bridge allows to connect on any port: telnet, pop, .... , while port
forwarding has to be set up for each port. OTOH, port forwarding can be set up
by a user). Changing the sentence as Ken wrote is a good idea too. I can do
that, but I'd rather finish the ticket on Kernel Configuration first, so if
anybody else wants to take it, please do.

Pierre

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to