If you run the tests for inkscape-0.91 (needs both lxdm and numpy) there are five failures because four svg files were omitted from the tarball.
I got a very quick explanation on their list, and I've downloaded the missing files and created a 12K patch. Is it acceptable to put that in the book as 'recommended, if running the testsuite'. If not, how should I describe the failures / should I instead add a URL with an explanation like *create the directory share/extensions/test/svg/ and then download the four files found at [long URL]" ? Opinions, please. ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
