Le 08/02/2015 00:17, Ken Moffat a écrit : > If you run the tests for inkscape-0.91 (needs both lxdm and numpy) > there are five failures because four svg files were omitted from the > tarball. > > I got a very quick explanation on their list, and I've downloaded > the missing files and created a 12K patch. Is it acceptable to put > that in the book as 'recommended, if running the testsuite'. If > not, how should I describe the failures / should I instead add a URL > with an explanation like *create the directory > share/extensions/test/svg/ and then download the four files found at > [long URL]" ? > > Opinions, please. > > ĸen >
I discovered somthing similar with gnumeric tests: a lot of tests are skipped because the sample input files are not present. The full sample directory is on their git repository, and I do not know why they do not put it in the tarball... Should I add optional instructions for checking out the git repository for full test coverage? Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
