Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 08/02/2015 00:17, Ken Moffat a écrit :
If you run the tests for inkscape-0.91 (needs both lxdm and numpy)
there are five failures because four svg files were omitted from the
tarball.
I got a very quick explanation on their list, and I've downloaded
the missing files and created a 12K patch. Is it acceptable to put
that in the book as 'recommended, if running the testsuite'. If
not, how should I describe the failures / should I instead add a URL
with an explanation like *create the directory
share/extensions/test/svg/ and then download the four files found at
[long URL]" ?
Opinions, please.
ĸen
I discovered somthing similar with gnumeric tests: a lot of tests are skipped
because the sample input files are not present. The full sample directory is
on their git repository, and I do not know why they do not put it in the
tarball...
Should I add optional instructions for checking out the git repository for
full test coverage?
Yes, that's a reasonable thing to do.
-- bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
