On 23.05.2015 04:14, BLFS Trac wrote: > #6526: xf86-video-intel segfaults unless forcing uxa acceleration on current > BLFS- > svn.
> > Comment (by ken@…): > > Replying to [comment:4 bdubbs@…]: > > Pretty poor response. What known error in gcc5? Is there a workaround? > Surely they don't expect user to revert to gcc-4.x. Surely inline doesn't > produce that much overhead on most current systems. > I think it is regarded as the same problem as > [https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873] > I've picked some patches from gcc 5 branch that were added post-release, and among them there is a fix referenced in the bug you mention. You can try it for yourself if you are up to rebuilding gcc. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/elkrejzi/system-management/master/patches/gcc-fixes.patch I have ommited all of the test suite additions/modifications, documentation and translations modifications and non-x86 architecture updates/fixes. > If so, looks as if current git versions of the intel driver will not be > usable with gcc-5.1. > > But I only tried the git version to see if the segfault had already been > fixed. > Unfortunately, we are on the bleeding edge here, along with Arch. > Arch uses post-release GCC snapshots. So they already include all (most) patches from gcc 5 branch. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
