On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:52:37PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > >>We seem to be getting closer to using non-released versions of > >>everything :-( > > Well, everything is a bit of an exaggeration. Generally it's because > upstream does not release "stable" packages in a timely manner (if at all). > > >>Whatever we do, I think it would be a good idea to keep some info > >>about using uxa to work around sna problems. But perhaps that > >>belongs in the wiki ? > > I think it's OK in the book as it is until a stable release is made. > Meanwhile, there is now a commit to upstream git to fix this. At the moment I'm re-rebuilding gcc to get the tests to run. This system already has patched gcc and is using ithe gitversion, but I can try the patch on 2.99.917. If it does the job, I'll go back to the main build with unpatched gcc.
ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
