On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 04:43:44PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:52:37PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > >>We seem to be getting closer to using non-released versions of > > >>everything :-( > > > > Well, everything is a bit of an exaggeration. Generally it's because > > upstream does not release "stable" packages in a timely manner (if at all). > > > > >>Whatever we do, I think it would be a good idea to keep some info > > >>about using uxa to work around sna problems. But perhaps that > > >>belongs in the wiki ? > > > > I think it's OK in the book as it is until a stable release is made. > > > Meanwhile, there is now a commit to upstream git to fix this. At > the moment I'm re-rebuilding gcc to get the tests to run. This > system already has patched gcc and is using ithe gitversion, but I > can try the patch on 2.99.917. If it does the job, I'll go back to > the main build with unpatched gcc. > It didn't fix it. I'll leave the book as it is and close the ticket.
Might still be a while before I get around to my other tickets - now that I've got a system with debug info I want to look at qupzilla (on the _previous_ version, it segfaults as soon as I try to play anything at youtube). <sigh/> ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
