On 12/11/2016 05:20, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> On 11/11/2016 20:01, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I am unable to get Seamonkey, Firefox, or Thunderbird to work properly with
>>> the latest SVN of BLFS.
>>>
>>> They all segfault with references to libpthread (expected), libnspr4, 
>>> libnss,
>>> and libxul.
>>>
>>> I've recompiled the entire NSS stack (p11-kit -> sqlite -> nspr -> nss), and
>>> when I get home, I'll attempt to build a debug build to see if I can debug
>>> this issue further.
>>>
>>> Different applications give me different behavior:
>>>
>>> Firefox will spuriously crash (probably background rendering... again)
>>> Thunderbird will crash when trying to send mail
>>> Seamonkey will crash before it finishes starting.
>>>
>>> I'll try to investigate this later, but this is all I've been able to do 
>>> for days.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Same issue here with Firefox (49.0.2) (*), but I have not seen anything with
>> Thunderbird, even when sending mail (I do not use seamonkey). Interestingly,
>> with exactly the same build, FF 48.0.2 seems to work perfectly. Maybe it has
>> something to do with the gtk3 patch, which was used in FF 48, and is not
>> applied with FF 49.
>>
>> (*) one sure way I can crash it is to write into the "search" field.
>>
>> Pierre
> 
> Thanks for the thoughts (I regard this as a *serious* problem) - but
> the patch (originally from fedora and also used at Arch) is no longer
> applied by them - it used to fix gtk+-3.20 changes, now a version is
> upstream.
> 
> My newest system is still 3.10 (I've got a newer LFS build, but I
> was expecting a new version of xorg-server would be coming soon (and
> I saw a comment the other month suggesting there is a new variant of
> one of the libs - I forget the details, but it looked like a new lib
> we don't use, possibly something like fonts2), so I've been deferring
> the xorg build.
> 
> On 7.10 with recent sqlite, nspr, nss it seems fine.  But I'm still
> on gtk+-3.20 and the old glib.
> 
> Which is your default engine for the Search field ?  Mine is
> wikipedia.
> 
> You say you have ff-48.0.2 working on the same build - is that a
> typo ?  I only see 48.0 in the releases. How about 49.0 ?

Thanks. I agree it is serious, but I am not sure I did not do something wrong...

It is not a typo : we had FF-48.0.2 in stable BLFS 7.10 (and actually, the
link in that page still works). But this reminds me that the base of this
build is stable LFS 7.10. Only BLFS is current SVN. I am not sure the changed
LFS packages versions are important for FF, though.

Let me try to get back to GTK-3.20 (I'm happy I use porg, so that I can
shuffle versions ;). Then I'll try previous sqlite, previous NSS, and previous
harfbuzz.

For the record, my DE/DM is LXDE/openbox. The engine for the search field is
google (the default). I tried to move to duckduckgo, but it opened the
duckduckgo page. I could search something, then it crashed (segfaulted) soon
after. I did not pursue further.

Regards,
Pierre
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to