On 2019-08-30 23:44 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On 2019-08-30 10:24 -0500, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > > On 2019-08-30 10:22, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On 2019-08-30 09:20 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > All packages have now been tagged and all tickets closed for the 9.0 > > > > release. What other things are remaining that we need to address > > > > before > > > > the Sunday release? > > > > > > > > -- Bruce > > > > > > It seems #12448 and #12459 contain various security fixes. Should we > > > backport > > > them to 9.0? > > > -- > > > Xi Ruoyao <xry...@mengyan1223.wang> > > > School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University > > > > #12456 (Ruby) has a fix for two vulnerabilities - one from 2012 and one > > from 2015. The problem with backporting updates is that I believe that > > everything that links to them has to be retested. That being said > > though, I'd give a +1 to backporting them. > > I'll try a full jhalfs build to verify 9.0 tomorrow. I hope I can use jhalfs > correctly and my 16-core workstation will work fine. But I can't guarantee > any > success. > > And volume-key can be built with Python 3 now. It should be OK to move the P2 > dependency to optional (for Python 2 binding). Should it be done in 9.0 or > 9.1?
Sorry not volume-key but I can't recall which one now... I built "that" package a week ago I think. Defer it to 9.1. -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@mengyan1223.wang> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
