On 2019-08-30 21:44 +0200, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > On 30/08/2019 17:44, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 2019-08-30 10:24 -0500, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > > > On 2019-08-30 10:22, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > On 2019-08-30 09:20 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > All packages have now been tagged and all tickets closed for the 9.0 > > > > > release. What other things are remaining that we need to address > > > > > before > > > > > the Sunday release? > > > > > > > > > > -- Bruce > > > > > > > > It seems #12448 and #12459 contain various security fixes. Should we > > > > backport > > > > them to 9.0? > > > > -- > > > > Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> > > > > School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University > > > > > > #12456 (Ruby) has a fix for two vulnerabilities - one from 2012 and one > > > from 2015. The problem with backporting updates is that I believe that > > > everything that links to them has to be retested. That being said > > > though, I'd give a +1 to backporting them. > > > > I'll try a full jhalfs build to verify 9.0 tomorrow. I hope I can use > > jhalfs > > correctly and my 16-core workstation will work fine. But I can't guarantee > > any > > success. > > > > If you need anything, please tell me. I think a full blfs can be built by > editing at most 30 scripts, most notably:
I failed. Either I misused jhalfs or it has a bug. I got some "Error 2" from make and was able to "fix" some of them. But at last I can't continue anymore. I'll read its documentation again... -- Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
