On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 02:05:57PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 9/25/19 12:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> >
>
> For comparison, attached are two elogind builds. The 90 build is a direct
> xorg build and completes xorg at about line 88. The 9a build followed a
> jhalfs generated order for elogind+gnome. It completes xorg around line
> 169.
I've just finished looking at those - a lot of differences in the
build orders compared to my builds (and I note that in 9a you built
kde on the way to gnome). I'll attach my own build order, with two
builds of elogind, i.e. the most recent "cannot startx as a user"
build (the past build on my haswell lacked the second build of
elogind and did startx as a user, but without access to the keyboard
and mouse).
As an aside, perhaps amdgpu (and maybe radeon) has a second issue - I
was testing out systemrescuecd-6.03 the other day - it has a 4.19
kernel and startx fails, trying to load radeon instead of amdgpu
(Picasso vga is not recognized, I suppose). By 'installing' the
stick's contents in RAM I was able to drop radeon and amdgpu, but
then startx failed, it could not use the framebuffer which I guess
was not surprising because it didn't know about the Picasso firmware.
Anyway, the main difference I see between your builds and mine is that
I omitted the following:
cracklib, and therefore I did not rebuild PAM
lsb-release
xcb-util-image
xcb-util-renderutil
xcb-util-wm
xcb-util-cursor
I wonder if the additional xcb-util items might make a difference
(I'd only previously built them for kde). I have not yet wiped the
system, but it's too late tonight to try adding them and reverting
the chmod on Xorg.
ĸen
--
Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather
boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth.
- Unseen Academicals
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
