On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: > On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote: > > Hello, > > > > According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable. > > > > Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401 > > is not including the 5.6 family?? > > > > My own point of interest with 5.6 is the time_namespace > > (for containers). > > > > Is 5.6.2 too new to be considered for the (B)LFS project? > > > With early 5.6 versions, 5.6/5.6.1, the Intel Wireless driver > (IWLWIFI) > was broken. I think we're holding to see if any other regressions > show > up under this release
Hmm I think from the thread on lfs-dev, that the kernel version will be updated when other packages need to be updated in lfs. It does not prevent users to update to recent kernels, of course... Maybe we could amend the note on the "All packages" page by telling to update to the most recent mainline version instead of the most recent 5.5.x version. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
