On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401
is not including the 5.6 family??
My own point of interest with 5.6 is the time_namespace
(for containers).
Is 5.6.2 too new to be considered for the (B)LFS project?
With early 5.6 versions, 5.6/5.6.1, the Intel Wireless driver
(IWLWIFI)
was broken. I think we're holding to see if any other regressions
show
up under this release
Hmm I think from the thread on lfs-dev, that the kernel version will be
updated when other packages need to be updated in lfs. It does not
prevent users to update to recent kernels, of course... Maybe we could
amend the note on the "All packages" page by telling to update to the
most recent mainline version instead of the most recent 5.5.x version.
I'll go ahead and make that change.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
