On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 12:43 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 4/3/20 12:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev > > > wrote: > > > > On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable. > > > > > > > > > > Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401 > > > > > is not including the 5.6 family?? > > > > > > > > > > My own point of interest with 5.6 is the time_namespace > > > > > (for containers). > > > > > > > > > > Is 5.6.2 too new to be considered for the (B)LFS project? > > > > > > > > > With early 5.6 versions, 5.6/5.6.1, the Intel Wireless driver > > > > (IWLWIFI) > > > > was broken. I think we're holding to see if any other > > > > regressions > > > > show > > > > up under this release > > > > > > Hmm I think from the thread on lfs-dev, that the kernel version > > > will be > > > updated when other packages need to be updated in lfs. It does > > > not > > > prevent users to update to recent kernels, of course... Maybe we > > > could > > > amend the note on the "All packages" page by telling to update to > > > the > > > most recent mainline version instead of the most recent 5.5.x > > > version. > > > > I'll go ahead and make that change. > > But I made that the latest stable version, not mainline. > > -- Bruce > My understanding of /www.kernel.org mainline is 5.6 stable is 5.6.2 (5.5.15 is flagged stable too). May be LFS could "jump" to 5.6.X
-- You have seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files www.osukiss.org -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
