On 2/28/07, Barius Drubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 23:15, Tijnema ! wrote: > Thanks anyway, and please have a look at my ps -A result. First weird thing: 1882 tty2 00:00:13 X 1936 tty1 00:00:00 agetty 1937 ? 00:00:00 agetty 1938 tty3 00:00:00 agetty 1939 tty4 00:00:00 agetty 1940 tty5 00:00:00 agetty 1941 tty6 00:00:00 agetty Normally X runs on virtual console 7 and shows up in ps listing without a controlling terminal. Somehow, you managed to start X on tty2, I'm not sure if that is intentional or not. But anyhow, you shouldn't be spawning a getty on the same tty as you run X. That is IMHO almost guaranteed to cause a conflict.
thanks, didn't noticed that. Will fix this one for sure. Second thing:
1927 ? 00:00:00 smbd 1932 ? 00:00:00 smbd 1919 ? 00:00:00 winbindd 1928 ? 00:00:00 winbindd You seem to be running multiple copies of certain daemons. It is possible that these daemons start child processes but I can't tell, since your ps output doesn't use the -H option nor give the PPID. If they are indeed duplicate instances, I can't predict the result but I don't think it is healthy.
These are child processes, no need to worry about :) See again Dan's earlier posting. KDM and startx are normally
alternative ways to start X. By alternative, I mean mutually exclusive, one or the other but not both.
But there's no double X server running, i will do some expiriments with it, but KDE is running fine again. Btw, i think KDM doesn't start, but i like it. It is my own server, and when it starts up, i don't see a login screen, but i'm directly logged in as root in KDE. That's what i always wanted :) --
Barius --
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
