-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tijnema ! wrote: > On 3/1/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 3/1/07, Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 2/28/07, Barius Drubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > > Second thing: >> > > 1927 ? 00:00:00 smbd >> > > 1932 ? 00:00:00 smbd >> > > 1919 ? 00:00:00 winbindd >> > > 1928 ? 00:00:00 winbindd >> > > >> > > You seem to be running multiple copies of certain daemons. It is >> > > possible that these daemons start child processes but I can't tell, >> > > since your ps output doesn't use the -H option nor give the PPID. If >> > > they are indeed duplicate instances, I can't predict the result but I >> > > don't think it is healthy. >> > >> > These are child processes, no need to worry about :) >> >> No, it is a problem. You have two copies of each process that are >> trying to use the exact same resources. What happens when a request >> comes in for smbd? Who gets it? They don't care that they're child >> processes. > > > I don't know, but it happens also when i just start them by hand.
Tijnema, If you use the command 'ps -ef' you will get the PID (process ID) and the PPID (parent process ID). Unless you have a lot of things starting at the same time I would expect the PID of the child to be the next consecutive number higher than the PID of the parent. If they are indeed parent and child processes then the PPID of the child will be the same as the PID of the parent. If the PPID of the child is not the same as the PID of the parent then they are independent processes not parent/child. Arnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF53giI9lqJPlLBqQRAu4QAJ0Vg82QNrv8xjgc0GG6C5Ve2its/ACgil2d DQXDUpiYqM1IRs/i8xCLYhk= =uCZo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
