alberto hernando wrote: > I've compiled x.org twice with no problem. You can find pixman-0.95 in the > libs directory. I just added it to my wget files and everything went fine.
Simon Geard wrote: > 0.9.5 ought to work perfectly - that's what I have installed. It > provides a pixman-1.pc file that should satisfy the xorg-server > requirement. Hi, Both of you are right, of course. It was all my fault, as I discovered several minutes after posting. Earlier this yera I had tried to build a 1.3.99 server, and did have the reverse problem - pixman-1 instead of pixman. I tried to circumvent that by renaming everything back to '-1'-less (which didn't work, needless to say). Anyway, this was still in my build script, and I certainly had forgotten all of that. To add insult to injury, my internet acces broke down right after posting, so I wasn't able to admit my mistake right away ... I've now used pixman-0.96. Compilation went fine, the new system wasn't booted yet. BTW: years and several (B)LFS ago, I could happily run X clients in chroot and get the windows on the server running on the host system. This no longer works: xterm Xt error: Can't open display: :0.0 (of course I did xhost +localhost; even xhost + doesn't help). Now I have to run an X server on a second machine, just to be able to unpack the JDK sources. (I really loathe those interactive, graphical installers. I want to script my installation!) Apologies for the noise (and the rant) Hans-Joachim -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
