>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]>
>To: BLFS Support List <[email protected]>
>Sent: Mon, Oct 18, 2010 5:16 pm
>Subject: Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.

>[email protected] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've recently installed LFS6.7 using jhalfs.  No probs.  Building
BLFS
> now to own requirements,but I've discovered a problem with
> /proc/version reporting wrong gcc version and compiled kernel.
>
> LFS 6.7 uses kernel 2.6.35.4
>
> 'cat /proc/version' gives:
>
> Linux version 2.6.27.10 (r...@cliffhanger) (gcc version 4.2.3) #1
> PREEMPT Sun Jan 3 19:49:10 GMT 2010
>
> 'uname -r' gives:
>
> 2.6.27.10
>
> AFAIK 'uname' reads its info from /lib/modules/RELEASE, which is
> 2.6.35.4

> /proc/version is compiled into the kernel.  It sounds like
>you booted the wrong kernel.

  Thanks Bruce, but definitely not.   I have two partitions, with the
host(an older LFS)on one and LFS6.7 on the other.  LFS6.7
is booting the new kernel(2.6.35.4), but proc/version and uname both
report it as the older kernel, 2.6.27.10.

Have just reinstalled kernel to be sure, still reporting it wrongly.

>LFS does not install a /lib/modules/RELEASE file.  I've not heard of
>that before.

When I say RELEASE I mean the kernel version, i.e.
/lib/modules/2.6.35.4.   This is what 'uname' reads?

thanks

MAC


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to