--- Em ter, 29/1/13, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013, 16:07
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:03:18AM
> -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> >
> > Hi, ĸen
> >
> > [I am reading the log of the strip everything just
> finished, so, do not
> > have all I need to answer, but perhaps I have enough.]
> >
> > Yes, I solved it. Took me a while. Everything worked
> after I completely
> > removed /usr/lib/libjpeg.so* and links to them (removed
> also libjpeg.la
> > and libjpeg.a, but I believe you do not have these) and
> reinstalled
> > libjpeg-turbo (no need to reinstall any of the
> mozillas, if they have
> > been buit with system jpeg). I had
> libjpeg.so.8.1.something and think
> > this was the source of the problems.
> >
> > Now, I have (I am in another host, performed, as I
> said, a strip
> > everything in LFS):
> >
> > $ ls -l /mnt/LFS/usr/lib/libjpeg.*
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 445424 Jan 21 12:49
> /mnt/LFS/usr/lib/libjpeg.a
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 784 Jan 21 12:49
> /mnt/LFS/usr/lib/libjpeg.la
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jan
> 21 12:49 /mnt/LFS/usr/lib/libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jan
> 21 12:49 /mnt/LFS/usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 ->
> libjpeg.so.8.0.2
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 365069 Jan 21 12:49
> /mnt/LFS/usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.2
> >
> > One of the links libjpeg.so or libjpeg.so.8 was
> pointing to the old
> > library, and just relinking did not solve. I removed
> with paco -r
> > libjepg-${old-version}, perhaps you will need to check
> the old
> > installed files to remove, if removing just the old
> libraries is not
> > enough. I do not know what to do if you have libjpeg
> older than 8 and
> > if these interfere too.
> >
> > It is a pleasure if I can help who has helped me so
> many times.
> >
> Intereesting. I have
> $ls -l /usr/lib/libjpeg.so*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jan 29
> 12:02 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jan 29
> 12:02 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 -> libjpeg.so.8.4.0
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 297681 Jan 29 12:02
> /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.2
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 258534 Aug 25 01:14
> /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.4.0
>
> So anything using libjpeg.so.8 would be using 8.4.0 from
> jpegsrc
> instead of 8.0.2 from libjpeg-turbo. Which means that
> my testing
> of 'display' from ImageMagick was picking up the old
> version. I
> wonder if something in xulrunner links to .so.8 instead of
> .so ?
> That might be interesting enough for me to try testing it
> (not
> tonight, and maybe not tomorrow).
>
> I can easily remake the .so.8 symlink, but I'll need to
> test some
> other stuff if that does fix firefox.
I did remake the symlink, I may be wrong, but think did not only once,
and it did not solve the problem. So in a final despair, I removed
everything, installed v8, everything ok, installed libjpeg-turbo, not
ok, then removed everything, put libjpeg-turbo and the miracle
(agnostic one) happened.
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
