[]s, Fernando
--- Em ter, 29/1/13, Fernando de Oliveira <fam...@yahoo.com.br> escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira <fam...@yahoo.com.br> > Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful > Para: "BLFS Support List" <blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org> > Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013, 16:20 > --- Em ter, 29/1/13, Bruce Dubbs > escreveu: > > > De: Bruce Dubbs > > Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system > jpeg considered harmful > > Para: "BLFS Support List" > > Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013, 16:14 > > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > > Found the file. > > > > > > I had (after many installs, without remove): > > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 448148 Jan 21 12:47 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.a > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 784 Jan 21 > 12:47 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.la > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 > Jan > > 21 12:47 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 > Jan > > 21 12:47 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 -> libjpeg.so.8.4.0 > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 367352 Jan 21 12:47 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 926875 Jan 21 12:46 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.4.0 > > > > > > Now I have: > > > > > > $ ls -l /usr/lib/libjpeg.* > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 445424 Jan 21 12:49 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.a > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 784 Jan 21 > 12:49 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.la > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 > Jan > > 21 12:49 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 > Jan > > 21 12:49 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 365069 Jan 21 12:49 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > > > > > > So, it was libjpeg.so.8.4.0 and the symlink > > libjpeg.so.8 which were interfering. > > > > You probably don't need the .a or .la files. I > have > > nvidia hardware and > > don't notice any jpeg related problems: > > > > lrwxrwxrwx 16 Jul 1 > 2012 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.4.0 > > lrwxrwxrwx 16 Jul 1 > 2012 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 -> libjpeg.so.8.4.0 > > -rwxr-xr-x 1027563 Jul 1 2012 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.4.0 > > > > I have not stripped the library. > > > > I'm not sure your problem was 8.4.0 as much as having > .so > > -> .8.0.2 > > (used for linking) and so.8 -> 8.4.0 (used at run > time). > > > > -- Bruce > > > As I wrote in the other post, this was my suspicion too, so > I did not > undertood why just redoing the symlink did not work. s/did not undertood/did not undertand/ Just remembered: after many *jepg* install/remove and at the same time (better say at the same problem), I had two versions of xulrunner/firefox-18.0.1, one with system jpeg, other with built-in jpeg. So, the same version did not work for one combination and later worked for the final libjpeg-turbo only. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
