Em 02-11-2013 23:14, alex lupu escreveu: > Is libvpx-v1.2.0 MD5SUM correct? > 4eab3775d178d44e084525ed978bcd9a > (BLFS book, version 2013-11-01) > > My calculations seem to show > f8de058e6ba14555144583a2d031fe19
Alex, thanks for reporting. There is a discrepancy. We have to investigate further. If I rename libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2-google the one at http://webm.googlecode.com/files/libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2 and libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2-anduin the one at http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/BLFS/svn/l/libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2 I get: $ md5sum libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2* 4eab3775d178d44e084525ed978bcd9a libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2-anduin f8de058e6ba14555144583a2d031fe19 libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2-google -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
