Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 02-11-2013 23:29, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: >> Em 02-11-2013 23:14, alex lupu escreveu: >>> Is libvpx-v1.2.0 MD5SUM correct? >>> 4eab3775d178d44e084525ed978bcd9a >>> (BLFS book, version 2013-11-01) >>> >>> My calculations seem to show >>> f8de058e6ba14555144583a2d031fe19 > > >> http://webm.googlecode.com/files/libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2 > >> http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/BLFS/svn/l/libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2 > >> $ md5sum libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2* >> 4eab3775d178d44e084525ed978bcd9a libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2-anduin >> f8de058e6ba14555144583a2d031fe19 libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2-google > > Fixed at revision 12121. Thanks, again. > > New md5sum: f8de058e6ba14555144583a2d031fe19 > > Apparently, they decided to remove two text files.
Yes it was a 'stealth' update by upstream. The old md5sum was correct when we updated the book. The removed files were .gitattributes and .gitignore. I've update the files master repo, but it will take a day to propagate. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
