Em 02-11-2013 23:29, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > Em 02-11-2013 23:14, alex lupu escreveu: >> Is libvpx-v1.2.0 MD5SUM correct? >> 4eab3775d178d44e084525ed978bcd9a >> (BLFS book, version 2013-11-01) >> >> My calculations seem to show >> f8de058e6ba14555144583a2d031fe19
> http://webm.googlecode.com/files/libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2 > http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/BLFS/svn/l/libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2 > $ md5sum libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2* > 4eab3775d178d44e084525ed978bcd9a libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2-anduin > f8de058e6ba14555144583a2d031fe19 libvpx-v1.2.0.tar.bz2-google Fixed at revision 12121. Thanks, again. New md5sum: f8de058e6ba14555144583a2d031fe19 Apparently, they decided to remove two text files. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
