On 12/25/13 13:55, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>> On 12/24/13 21:46, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On 12/24/13 09:53, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>>>> Em 24-12-2013 11:02, [email protected] escreveu:
>>>>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/nss/nss-3.15.1-standalone-2.patch
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, I am aware and downloaded the correct patch months ago when I built
>>>> BLFS. But shouldn't the BLFS 7.4 documentation link be changed?
>>> No. We don't change the book once it is released. We just add errata.
>>> Thank you. I don't think I understand the logic in that but I'll take it
>>> off my list.
> It's the same logic used by RFCs.
>
> -- Bruce
>
That's great, but it still makes no sense to me. I understand adding
errata, but to not correct a broken link(s)? It wouldn't be a
noticeable change of wording or procedure, it would simply eliminate an
error message(s). Why generate an unnecessary error message(s)? Mind
you, I'm not at all militant about this and there are tons of things
that make no sense to me (welcome to my life). It's just my take.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
