ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
On 08/24/2014 08:38 AM, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
After reviewing the scripts again and again, it turns out that there are
two issues over here.
First, libdrm-2.4.56 has to be build after Xorg libs, which are more
required than recommended.
We have always assumed that the recommended packages have been installed
for the BLFS instructions. I just made that more explicit in the "Notes
on Building Software" section:
"Recommended means that BLFS strongly suggests this package is installed
first for a clean and trouble-free build, that won't have issues either
during the build process, or at run-time. The instructions in the book
assume these packages are installed. Some changes or workarounds may be
required if these packages are not installed."
I finally build using book's instructions
./configure --prefix=/usr \
--enable-udev &&
make
but still get some tests not passed. Anyway, there is a second issue.
Tests are not always clean. That may be an upstream issue or a BLFS
issue, however if the vast majority of tests pass, then it's usually OK.
Now in Xorg libs, libXfont-1.4.8 fails with this requirement:
Requested 'fontsproto < 2.1.3' but version of FontsProto is 2.1.3
If you reverse to fonstproto-2.1.2 in Xorg protocols again, everything
goes fine through Xorg libs, libdrm, Mesa and so on ... until
xorg-server-1.16.0 that complains:
Requested 'fontsproto >= 2.1.3' but version of FontsProto is 2.1.2
So, fontsproto must be at 2.1.3 in order to use xorg-server-1.16.0.
You are using the development version of the book, so you should not be
suprised if there are issues, especially if you are deviating from what
BLFS expects.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
