On 02-11-2014 16:22, Richard Melville wrote: > Fernando, I've just finished running your tests on Paco-2.0.7 and > Porg-0.7. I replicated your tests exactly; I created similar files and > directories, and named them with similar names. For some reason on my > system *both* Paco and Porg install and log correctly, and remove *all* > instances using the -r option. > > I'm not sure what to suggest -- maybe you have some ideas.
Thanks for the reply. In several versions of LFS, it does error similarly, for me. I just install with CMMI ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-gpaco" and after, run make logme And I remember that in the original site for paco it was mentioned to fail for something, IIRC, glibc, and there were instructions on how to work around that. But cannot say that the problems I consistently have are the same. I am sorry, but I feel responsible for warning about eventual problems with paco and porg, that I agree to recommend, so that the user be careful. Hope you don't mind my interventions, in these eventualities. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
