On 2 November 2014 19:57, Fernando de Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02-11-2014 16:22, Richard Melville wrote: > > > Fernando, I've just finished running your tests on Paco-2.0.7 and > > Porg-0.7. I replicated your tests exactly; I created similar files and > > directories, and named them with similar names. For some reason on my > > system *both* Paco and Porg install and log correctly, and remove *all* > > instances using the -r option. > > > > I'm not sure what to suggest -- maybe you have some ideas. > > Thanks for the reply. In several versions of LFS, it does error > similarly, for me. > > I just install with CMMI > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-gpaco" > > and after, run > > make logme > > And I remember that in the original site for paco it was mentioned to > fail for something, IIRC, glibc, and there were instructions on how to > work around that. But cannot say that the problems I consistently have > are the same. > > I am sorry, but I feel responsible for warning about eventual problems > with paco and porg, that I agree to recommend, so that the user be > careful. Hope you don't mind my interventions, in these eventualities. > > Not at all -- I'm glad to help. Do you have any idea why both Paco and Porg work for me but not for you? Richard
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
