On 02-11-2014 17:19, Richard Melville wrote: > On 2 November 2014 19:57, Fernando de Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 02-11-2014 16:22, Richard Melville wrote: >> >>> Fernando, I've just finished running your tests on Paco-2.0.7 and >>> Porg-0.7. I replicated your tests exactly; I created similar files and >>> directories, and named them with similar names. For some reason on my >>> system *both* Paco and Porg install and log correctly, and remove *all* >>> instances using the -r option. >>> >>> I'm not sure what to suggest -- maybe you have some ideas. >> >> Thanks for the reply. In several versions of LFS, it does error >> similarly, for me. >> >> I just install with CMMI >> >> ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-gpaco" >> >> and after, run >> >> make logme >> >> And I remember that in the original site for paco it was mentioned to >> fail for something, IIRC, glibc, and there were instructions on how to >> work around that. But cannot say that the problems I consistently have >> are the same. >> >> I am sorry, but I feel responsible for warning about eventual problems >> with paco and porg, that I agree to recommend, so that the user be >> careful. Hope you don't mind my interventions, in these eventualities. >> >> Not at all -- I'm glad to help. Do you have any idea why both Paco and > Porg work for me but not for you?
Porg sometimes logs files that are not installed in the system, but in the source directory. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
