On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 07:31:19PM -0700, Paul Rogers wrote: > "moaning"? Oh my, I fear the intent of my question was misinterpretted. > > I _have_ been using xpdf for at least a few years now and it has always > seemed to work for me, as best I recall. The major complaint I would > have with it is its UI is a little, can I call it, "clunky". If there > were a nicer, easier to use, better looking, package I wouldn't mind > replacing it. > > As best I could determine from all my looking around for Linux PDF > viewers today, ePDFView seemed to be abandoned. I was concerned about > installing an abandoned package, with nobody to attend to it--not that I > haven't anyhow. Are you saying LFS is supporting, maintaining it now? No, but it works as well as it ever did - ISTR that gentoo dropped support for it when a simple fix reinstated how it had previously worked. And one of our users posted a patch which he says makes it work on some other PDFs.
In BLFS we probably have several packages with no active upstream, but they all seem to work as well as they ever did. ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. hSometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
