On Saturday 18 April 2015 16:24:15 Cifer Lee wrote: > > No. systemd is a solution looking for a problem. > > > > -- Bruce > > Yes, glad to see LFS boycott systemd
I do not agree at all with "LFS boycotts systemd" ! I am working with systemd, as I found it in the LFS-book and at that time nobody could tell me the pros and contras of SysV init vs. systemd. As a lot of distributors switched to systemd ( Fedora, OpenSUSE, Arch Linux, Mageia, OpenMandriva, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, CentOS ), I cannot agree neither with "solution looking for a problem". That is too easy. The distributors have for sure good arguments for doing that. There is a very nice blog post "Why systemd ?" which works out the differences between the systems: "http://blog.jorgenschaefer.de/2014/07/why-systemd.html"; I think, SysV init or systemd should remain for the time beeing a personal decision, and both systems should be supported by LFS, not one boycotted. Edgar -- Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers <[email protected]> GPG Key ID:AD5C6F70 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
