> Yes. But I recommend 7.8. I know, but I never have liked being a Trail Blazer. ;-)
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue > /architecture.html > >First paragraph. I read that just yesterday, but sometimes people aren't exactly clear and interpretations can be muddled if one doesn't know what's being said already. I figured that could refer to CLFS or some arcane tweaks. Then there's the "with some modifications", which casts a cloud over the whole paragraph. >I have not run into any of the problems mentioned in the last paragraph >and although that paragraph is still probably (marginally) valid, I >really doubt you will see any problems. We removed a lot of ancient >Xorg drivers some time ago. But that paragraph too casts a cloud over the 64-bit issue. This whole section reads "soft" to me. There is possible confusion because 64-bit hardware runs a 32-bit Linux system without complaint. It doesn't have strong positive statements, e.g. this book works for 32-bit hardware with a 32-bit host Linux system, and also 64-bit hardware with a 64-bit Linux system. Yeah, I'd like to see a statement like that in there! -- Paul Rogers [email protected] Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) -- http://www.fastmail.com - The way an email service should be -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
