Is there a a reason why blfs recommends to install ca-certs in this way rather than, for example, the way Debian does it?
1. Unless I made a mistake somewhere, the blfs method does not install anything in /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla - I presume that browsers expect to find something there? 2. The blfs method does not give the certificates a human readable name. 3. The blfs certifcates are significantly larger (extraneous information is stripped out by Debian) - the concatenated file ca-certificates.crt is four times larger 4. The symlink ca-certificates.crt -> cacerts.pem is not created. 5. /etc/ca-certificates.conf (a list of the certificates) is not created. Regards John -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
