On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 21:25:02 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support <blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 08:00:39AM -0400, Scott Andrews via > blfs-support wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:06:34 +0100 > > Ken Moffat via blfs-support > > <blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 08:01:18PM -0400, Scott Andrews via > > > blfs-support wrote: > > > > > > > If you never need to build multilib (e.g. 32-bit and 64-bit) then > > > moving them should not cause you any trouble. > > > > > > Looking at Arch for xorgproto, the only pc file that I see > > > mentioned at > > > https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/packages/xorgproto/trunk/PKGBUILD > > > is applewmproto.pc which they remove as part of cleaning up the > > > apple stuff. I don't see any mention of the other pc files being > > > moved. > > > > > > Similarly, fedora, mandriva cooker are using /usr/share. > > > > > > ĸen > > > > They are in /usr/share/pkgconfig > > > > Indeed, and yet your original post implied that Arch were installing > them in /usr/lib/pkgconfig: > > | *.pc files in wrong directory > | > | install -m755 -d /usr/lib > | mv /usr/share/pkgconfig /usr/lib/ > > > Name : xorgproto > > Version : 2019.1 > > Release : 1 > > Architecture: armv7hnl > > Install Date: (not installed) > > Group : Xorg > > Size : 4060717 > > License : Other > > Signature : (none) > > Source RPM : xorgproto-2019.1-1.src.rpm > > Build Date : Fri Aug 28 11:53:31 2020 > > Build Host : rpi.example.org > > Relocations : (not relocatable) > > Vendor : Octothorpe > > URL : https://xorg.freedesktop.org/ > > Summary : Combined X.Org X11 Protocol headers > > Description : > > Combined X.Org X11 Protocol headers > > > > [ putolin ] > > > > An interesting word for snipping, somebody by another name used > that. I have no problem with whatever language people wish to use, > merely mentioning it. > > > /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-kbproto > > Licenses can reasonably go into /usr/share/licenses (in BLFS we do > not explicitly install them if the package does not automatically do > that - but for anyone who provides a binary package that is a good > idea). Not material > > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/bigreqsproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/compositeproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/damageproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/dmxproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/dri2proto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/dri3proto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/fixesproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/fontsproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/glproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/inputproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/kbproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/presentproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/randrproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/recordproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/renderproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/resourceproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/scrnsaverproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/videoproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/windowswmproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xcmiscproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xextproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xf86bigfontproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xf86dgaproto.pc > > But you started by saying that /usr/share/pkgconfig is the wrong > directory. That is correct, But......... You said they were in /usr/lib/pkgconfig, they are in /usr/share/pkgconfig. I rebuilt the package according to BLFS and posted the result. > > Those all match the canonical Arch install at > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/xorgproto/ I moved them to were they should be, for consistency > I repeat: you can do what you want for pkgconfig files on a > non-multilib build. But saying that Arch are installing them in > /usr/lib is at best misleading. The ones that are in /usr/share/pkgconfig are not architecture specific at least the packages I have built. That means it is NOT an issue on multilib. Who does that? How many people even run multilib? > > ĸen -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
