Very nicely stated.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dale Leavens
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 1:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [BlindHandyMan] Home Gyms

Better is a relative term.

Decide on your goals, what is your objective? Once you figure that out you
will better know what it is you need to achieve that.

For cardio vascular aerobic exercise I have a Nordic Track cross country ski
machine. It does take a little skill to get the hand of it and not everyone
likes that aspect of it but it doesn't take long to get up a good sweat and
keep it. On the other hand I don't much like those elliptical trainers, they
are like walking on the moon bobbing up and down like that but many people
really like them.

The trouble with free weights is the room they need, fortunately for me I
suppose I am short enough that I can snatch without driving them through the
ceiling but not everyone can.

None of the mechanical weight circuits accurately reflect the weight being
used. You can pin any number to the stack but most use pulleys not only to
change direction but often they loop in such a way to give mechanical
advantage, that is, pull three feet on the cable and the weight rises a foot
and a half, that sort of thing. There is also the inertia of the machine to
take into account and friction of moving parts too. Many also use cams to
try to equalize the force or direction so that the resistance is closer to
the actual direction of the work but these too alter the actual amount of
weight being moved. In that sense free weights are the only really accurate
and reliable measure of resistance. Even though you can technically
calculate and allow for mechanical disadvantage or advantage as the case may
be I can assure you having hung actual weight from a number of weight
training machines that there isn't any reliable relationship between the
weight load on the stack and the actual balancing load on the handle. this
isn't necessarily true for all units but I haven't yet met one with an
accurate relationship.

The point of those machines is to save room. If the bands on a Bowflex or
what ever else are calibrated in pounds or dirometers is not relevant. They
should probably be calibrated just as the stereo,. Just a number so you can
return to the same one dependably when you want.

It seems to me that most of us as blind people want the aerobic exercise,
the cardiopulmonary work-out. Some may ride a tandem bike but mostly we lack
that opportunity, even a brisk walk isn't really all that satisfying because
of the energy used in wayfinding and avoiding overhanging trees or parked
cars. Running a dog I suppose for some might be an option and maybe some do
that I haven't ever seen it but it is possible.There are treadmills and ski
machines and elliptical trainers and exercise cycles. Swimming if convenient
and you have access to a long enough pool for some good lengths can be a
pretty good option. I used to enjoy cross country skiing but it does require
a partner and that isn't always convenient for me, either I am busy or they
are busy and eventually it falls apart. Used to ride a tandem bike too but
the same problem. I haven't been working out in my exercise room much for a
long time, by the time I finish work and now am in the middle of a couple of
shop projects then there is snow to shovel and in the summer gardening and
grass to cut and on it goes. Hooking up with someone for a bike ride or a
ski, it just doesn't happen.

Anyway, the point I wanted to make is that one shouldn't get too fixated on
the weights displayed either on the pulley circuits or the band type
machines or even those hydraulic pistons. Do consider the structure of the
equipment, noise, things like size and durability. If it isn't convenient
you won't use it and if it isn't comfortable you won't use it. If it folds
up and fits under your bed that is probably where it will stay.

These are just my observations over what is now approaching 40 years of
personal experience and observation of literally thousands of others.

Dale Leavens, Cochrane Ontario Canada
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:DLeavens%40puc.net> 
Skype DaleLeavens
Come and meet Aurora, Nakita and Nanook at our polar bear habitat.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Larry Stansifer 
To: [email protected] <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com>  
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: [BlindHandyMan] Home Gyms

I use free weights a lot in the gym and was actually considering buying a
bench based system that includes a squott station, leg curl and quad curl
station but when I tried it out in the store it felt really flimsy and like
it wanted to come apart and that was just using the 110 LB included weight
set. Most of that stuff looks like toys to me. A couple of guys on Carol's
department have bowflexes but like the soloflex they make you look better
than you really are.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> ]
On Behalf Of Bob Kennedy
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 11:22 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> 
Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Home Gyms

I have free weights so I'm probably no help. I don't know if they still
make it or not, but I can say beware of the soloflex gym. That was the one
with "resistance bands." A friend bought one and I could bench the highest
resistance band which said it was 500 pounds. Great for the ego but not
realistic. At that time I could do half that weight on a good day. Maybe
someone else will have a better recommendation. 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Larry Stansifer 
To: [email protected] <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com>  
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 1:05 PM
Subject: [BlindHandyMan] Home Gyms

This morning while slaving away on the squat-rack in my local gym, one of
the girls on the front desk told me that they were moving to a larger
facility on the other side of town. Much to far to walk besides which
interstate15 is in the way.
Do any of you folks have any suggestions for a home gym alternative? I
need
something that can provide a total body workout and with at least 300 LB's
of resistance.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

To listen to the show archives go to link http://acbradio.org/handyman.html
<http://acbradio.org/handyman.html> 
or ftp://ftp.acbradio.org/acbradio-archives/handyman/
<ftp://ftp.acbradio.org/acbradio-archives/handyman/> 

The Pod Cast address for the Blind Handy Man Show is.
http://www.acbradio.org/news/xml/podcast.php?pgm=saturday
<http://www.acbradio.org/news/xml/podcast.php?pgm=saturday> 

Visit The Blind Handy Man Files Page To Review Contributions From Various
List Members At The Following address: http://www.jaws-users.com/handyman/
<http://www.jaws-users.com/handyman/> 

Visit the archives page at the following address
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>  

If you would like to join the Blind Computing list, then visit the following
address for more information:
http://jaws-users.com/mailman/listinfo/blind-computing_jaws-users.com
<http://jaws-users.com/mailman/listinfo/blind-computing_jaws-users.com> 

For a complete list of email commands pertaining to the Blind Handy Man list
just send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:blindhandyman-help%40yahoogroups.com>  
Yahoo! Groups Links

-- 
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
------------------------------------------------------

Teach InfoWest Spam Trap if this mail (ID 146647384) is spam:
Spam:
https://spamtrap.infowest.com/canit/b.php?i=146647384&m=1d63d7b68064&c=s
<https://spamtrap.infowest.com/canit/b.php?i=146647384&m=1d63d7b68064&c=s> 
Not spam:
https://spamtrap.infowest.com/canit/b.php?i=146647384&m=1d63d7b68064&c=n
<https://spamtrap.infowest.com/canit/b.php?i=146647384&m=1d63d7b68064&c=n> 
Forget vote:
https://spamtrap.infowest.com/canit/b.php?i=146647384&m=1d63d7b68064&c=f
<https://spamtrap.infowest.com/canit/b.php?i=146647384&m=1d63d7b68064&c=f> 
------------------------------------------------------
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 

Reply via email to