If we're first to implement, we should always be asking for design guidance 
from the TAG. That a feature originates in the CSS WG is not a pass for 
design review (although I know CSS WG participants often wish it were).

Best,

Alex

On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 11:42:31 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:

> Thanks for feedbacks!
>
> 1. Explainer : I added an csswg-drafts issue link(
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6965) into explainer. It has 
> been re-opened due to the fullscreen spec.
>
> 2. fullscreen spec : As mentioned, issue has been re-opened due to this. 
> Further discussion is needed.
>
> 3. TAG review : I think  it would not needed since it's an existing spec 
> discussed. If not, please let me know :)
>
> 4. Gecko vendor signal : I set gecko's signal to 'Shipped/Shipping' as the 
> doc(bit.ly/blink-signals) defines 'Shipped/Shipping' as 'Link to public 
> documentation or bug/issue'. I'm not sure which signal would be right if 
> there is an open issue.
>
> 5. WPT link :There were some differences between what was written in 
> chromestatus and I2S. I added WPT test links but on I2S that is not shown.
> As Emillo mentioned, WPT links are as follows.
> http://wpt.live//css/selectors/modal-pseudo-class.html
> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/selectors/modal-pseudo-class.html
>
> Thanks again!
>
>
> 2022년 5월 26일 목요일 오전 1시 0분 45초 UTC+9에 [email protected]님이 작성:
>
>> I'd like to see an explainer and completed TAG review before moving 
>> forward. Could this perhaps be going to OT instead?
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 3:44:22 AM UTC-7 Emilio Cobos Alvarez wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/25/22 09:38, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: 
>>> > There are these tests for ":modal": 
>>> > * http://http://wpt.live//css/selectors/modal-pseudo-class.html 
>>> > * 
>>> > http://
>>> http://wpt.live//css/selectors/invalidation/modal-pseudo-class-in-has.html 
>>> > 
>>> > They are for <dialog>, but it looks there are no tests for the 
>>> > fullscreen case. 
>>>
>>> It isn't clear from the resolution[1] that this should apply to 
>>> fullscreen, and it doesn't seem like WebKit's implementation does that 
>>> (it seems a bit weird that it would since fullscreen at least in Gecko 
>>> isn't modal / doesn't make the rest of the page inert...). 
>>>
>>> I commented on the spec issue about this. 
>>>
>>> -- Emilio 
>>>
>>> [1]: 
>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6965#issuecomment-1118033655
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/224a52cb-fdd7-4f6a-afb9-09e47fef2435n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to