I've updated chromestatus. Thanks :)

2022년 8월 25일 목요일 오전 4시 3분 36초 UTC+9에 [email protected]님이 작성:

> On Friday, July 1, 2022 at 9:55:38 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> No, it's my bad.
>> I'm planning to ship this in 106.
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> Quick update: it appears that the change in Chromium landed in r1026764 
> <https://crrev.com/1026764>, which is v105.0.5195.0 
> <https://storage.googleapis.com/chromium-find-releases-static/3ae.html#3ae44a6398632cd89e42ff9ed35444392d19008d>.
>  
> So it's shipping/shipped in M105, not M106. If that's true, would you mind 
> please updating chromestatus accordingly?
>
>  
>
>> 2022년 7월 1일 금요일 오전 2시 17분 41초 UTC+9에 Joe Medley님이 작성:
>>
>>> I asked my question badly. In which milestone are you planning to ship 
>>> this?
>>>
>> Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | [email protected] | 
>>> 816-678-7195 <(816)%20678-7195>
>>> *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 9:26 AM Jihwan Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Patch is almost ready as follows.
>>>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3655618
>>>>
>>>> But there is no WPT test to check if it is :modal when fullscreen, and 
>>>> I'm writing it now.
>>>>
>>>> 2022년 7월 1일 금요일 오전 12시 46분 27초 UTC+9에 Joe Medley님이 작성:
>>>>
>>>>> When are you planning to ship this?
>>>>> Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | [email protected] | 
>>>>> 816-678-7195 <(816)%20678-7195>
>>>>> *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 8:51 AM Mike West <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> LGTM3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:50 PM Manuel Rego Casasnovas <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LGTM2 too with Philip's requests.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 29/06/2022 17:48, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>>>>>> > LGTM1 to ship this with the latest spec changes applied, and WPT
>>>>>>> > written and passing for that.
>>>>>>> > 
>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:27 PM Manuel Rego Casasnovas <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Does Chromium implementation match the spec resolution, so :modal
>>>>>>> >> applies to fullscreen too?
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Are there tests checking that?
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Cheers,
>>>>>>> >>   Rego
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> On 27/06/2022 15:20, Jihwan Kim wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> I have updated the I2S contents including explainer, vendor 
>>>>>>> signals
>>>>>>> >>> those are commented.
>>>>>>> >>> We may now progress this I2S.
>>>>>>> >>> thanks.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> 2022년 6월 24일 금요일 오전 4시 2분 49초 UTC+9에 Chris Harrelson님이 작성:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>     The CSSWG just resolved yesterday that :modal should apply to
>>>>>>> >>>     fullscreen, and that fullscreen should be modal. So I think 
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> >>>     intent is unblocked.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>     On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:50 PM Jihwan Kim <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>         Thanks for Chris Harrelson.
>>>>>>> >>>         Once "should fullscreen be modal?" is resolved, I'll keep
>>>>>>> >>>         progress this.
>>>>>>> >>>         thanks.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>         2022년 6월 9일 목요일 오전 3시 0분 58초 UTC+9에 Chris Harrelson
>>>>>>> >>>         님이 작성:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>             I've also added "should fullscreen be modal?" to the 
>>>>>>> CSSWG
>>>>>>> >>>             agenda. Once that is resolved this intent is ready 
>>>>>>> to ship,
>>>>>>> >>>             in my view.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>             On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 10:59 AM Chris Harrelson
>>>>>>> >>>             <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>                 On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 1:21 AM Arthur Sonzogni
>>>>>>> >>>                 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>                     Hello,
>>>>>>> >>>                     It would be nice if there was some 
>>>>>>> repository or
>>>>>>> >>>                     documents were we could fill some 
>>>>>>> security/privacy
>>>>>>> >>>                     questions. I will do it here instead.
>>>>>>> >>>                     How does this interacts with iframes? Do you 
>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>> >>>                     where it might be defined in the spec? I 
>>>>>>> remember
>>>>>>> >>>                     for the modal dialog, there was some 
>>>>>>> "inertness"
>>>>>>> >>>                     attribute propagated toward parent/iframes. 
>>>>>>> It was
>>>>>>> >>>                     shown it can be used to leak cross-site 
>>>>>>> data, or it
>>>>>>> >>>                     can be used to create new communication 
>>>>>>> channel. It
>>>>>>> >>>                     was found and fixed here: 
>>>>>>> https://crbug.com/1293191
>>>>>>> >>>                     <https://crbug.com/1293191>. I guess the two
>>>>>>> >>>                     features relies on the same mechanism and 
>>>>>>> Chrome
>>>>>>> >>>                     might immune as result. Anyway, could you 
>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>> >>>                     make sure the behavior is specified and show 
>>>>>>> how it
>>>>>>> >>>                     doesn't create a cross-site leak?
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>                 You are correct that the same mechanism
>>>>>>> >>>                 prevented cross-site information leaks for 
>>>>>>> "both". In
>>>>>>> >>>                 other words, thet modal dialog feature doesn't
>>>>>>> >>>                 propagate, due to the fix for issue 1293191.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>                 :modal is a pseudoclass state that only changes 
>>>>>>> style
>>>>>>> >>>                 for a <dialog> element in the same document as 
>>>>>>> the style
>>>>>>> >>>                 sheet using :modal. Therefore a cross-origin 
>>>>>>> iframe
>>>>>>> >>>                 won't be able to change its document's state 
>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>> >>>                 :modal. So I don't see a way that this feature 
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> >>>                 introduce new security or privacy issues. Let me 
>>>>>>> know if
>>>>>>> >>>                 this doesn't fully answer your questions.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>                     Filling
>>>>>>> >>>                     the 
>>>>>>> https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/
>>>>>>> >>>                     <
>>>>>>> https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/> is often
>>>>>>> >>>                     helpful as well ;-)
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>                     On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 6:51:19 PM 
>>>>>>> UTC+2 Mike
>>>>>>> >>>                     Taylor wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>                         On 5/26/22 9:35 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>                         On 5/26/22 2:42 AM, Jihwan Kim wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>                         4. Gecko vendor signal : I set gecko's 
>>>>>>> signal
>>>>>>> >>>>>                         to 'Shipped/Shipping' as the
>>>>>>> >>>>>                         doc(bit.ly/blink-signals
>>>>>>> >>>>>                         <https://bit.ly/blink-signals>) 
>>>>>>> defines
>>>>>>> >>>>>                         'Shipped/Shipping' as 'Link to public
>>>>>>> >>>>>                         documentation or bug/issue'. I'm not 
>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>> >>>>>                         which signal would be right if there 
>>>>>>> is an
>>>>>>> >>>>>                         open issue.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>                         Thank for this feedback - I can see how 
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> >>>>                         is confusing. I updated the language to 
>>>>>>> say
>>>>>>> >>>>                         "Link to public documentation or 
>>>>>>> bug/issue
>>>>>>> >>>>                         that demonstrates the issue has shipped 
>>>>>>> (i.e.,
>>>>>>> >>>>                         an issue that links to patches that 
>>>>>>> have been
>>>>>>> >>>>                         merged, or a comment that a previously
>>>>>>> >>>>                         disabled feature is not enabled by 
>>>>>>> default)."
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>                         (this should read "now enabled by 
>>>>>>> default",
>>>>>>> >>>                         rather than "not"). 🙈
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>                     --
>>>>>>> >>>                     You received this message because you are 
>>>>>>> subscribed
>>>>>>> >>>                     to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>> >>>                     To unsubscribe from this group and stop 
>>>>>>> receiving
>>>>>>> >>>                     emails from it, send an email to
>>>>>>> >>>                     [email protected].
>>>>>>> >>>                     To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> >>>                     
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f75f277a-11ca-4482-9af0-7764f1241eafn%40chromium.org
>>>>>>> >>>                     <
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f75f277a-11ca-4482-9af0-7764f1241eafn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
>>>>>>> >.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>         --
>>>>>>> >>>         You received this message because you are subscribed to 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> >>>         Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>> >>>         To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails 
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> >>>         it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>         To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> >>>         
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/293471ff-f32c-4223-b2cd-994d5d018c59n%40chromium.org
>>>>>>> >>>         <
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/293471ff-f32c-4223-b2cd-994d5d018c59n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
>>>>>>> >.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> --
>>>>>>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>> Google
>>>>>>> >>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>> it, send
>>>>>>> >>> an email to [email protected]
>>>>>>> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>>>> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> >>> 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/09a12ad7-8b0d-4c34-87da-f2f08367242cn%40chromium.org
>>>>>>> >>> <
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/09a12ad7-8b0d-4c34-87da-f2f08367242cn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
>>>>>>> >.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>> Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/bfeccc32-0e8c-86b4-994a-1392b94b081e%40igalia.com
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> > 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d1d0560a-88b3-3b26-2101-9fc6043e223a%40igalia.com
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3DcbTVJtque1KL_gqYM4-CY6X99sELS7XB%3DW-rUKZf_5CQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3DcbTVJtque1KL_gqYM4-CY6X99sELS7XB%3DW-rUKZf_5CQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/58c1560f-f99e-4bd2-af56-fee72fb38011n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to