No, it's my bad.
I'm planning to ship this in 106.
Thanks!

2022년 7월 1일 금요일 오전 2시 17분 41초 UTC+9에 Joe Medley님이 작성:

> I asked my question badly. In which milestone are you planning to ship 
> this?
>
> Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | [email protected] | 
> 816-678-7195 <(816)%20678-7195>
> *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.*
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 9:26 AM Jihwan Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Patch is almost ready as follows.
>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3655618
>>
>> But there is no WPT test to check if it is :modal when fullscreen, and 
>> I'm writing it now.
>>
>> 2022년 7월 1일 금요일 오전 12시 46분 27초 UTC+9에 Joe Medley님이 작성:
>>
>>> When are you planning to ship this?
>>> Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | [email protected] | 
>>> 816-678-7195 <(816)%20678-7195>
>>> *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 8:51 AM Mike West <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> LGTM3.
>>>>
>>>> -mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:50 PM Manuel Rego Casasnovas <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> LGTM2 too with Philip's requests.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 29/06/2022 17:48, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>>>> > LGTM1 to ship this with the latest spec changes applied, and WPT
>>>>> > written and passing for that.
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:27 PM Manuel Rego Casasnovas <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Does Chromium implementation match the spec resolution, so :modal
>>>>> >> applies to fullscreen too?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Are there tests checking that?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Cheers,
>>>>> >>   Rego
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On 27/06/2022 15:20, Jihwan Kim wrote:
>>>>> >>> I have updated the I2S contents including explainer, vendor signals
>>>>> >>> those are commented.
>>>>> >>> We may now progress this I2S.
>>>>> >>> thanks.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> 2022년 6월 24일 금요일 오전 4시 2분 49초 UTC+9에 Chris Harrelson님이 작성:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>     The CSSWG just resolved yesterday that :modal should apply to
>>>>> >>>     fullscreen, and that fullscreen should be modal. So I think 
>>>>> this
>>>>> >>>     intent is unblocked.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>     On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:50 PM Jihwan Kim <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>         Thanks for Chris Harrelson.
>>>>> >>>         Once "should fullscreen be modal?" is resolved, I'll keep
>>>>> >>>         progress this.
>>>>> >>>         thanks.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>         2022년 6월 9일 목요일 오전 3시 0분 58초 UTC+9에 Chris Harrelson
>>>>> >>>         님이 작성:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>             I've also added "should fullscreen be modal?" to the 
>>>>> CSSWG
>>>>> >>>             agenda. Once that is resolved this intent is ready to 
>>>>> ship,
>>>>> >>>             in my view.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>             On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 10:59 AM Chris Harrelson
>>>>> >>>             <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>                 On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 1:21 AM Arthur Sonzogni
>>>>> >>>                 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>                     Hello,
>>>>> >>>                     It would be nice if there was some repository 
>>>>> or
>>>>> >>>                     documents were we could fill some 
>>>>> security/privacy
>>>>> >>>                     questions. I will do it here instead.
>>>>> >>>                     How does this interacts with iframes? Do you 
>>>>> know
>>>>> >>>                     where it might be defined in the spec? I 
>>>>> remember
>>>>> >>>                     for the modal dialog, there was some 
>>>>> "inertness"
>>>>> >>>                     attribute propagated toward parent/iframes. It 
>>>>> was
>>>>> >>>                     shown it can be used to leak cross-site data, 
>>>>> or it
>>>>> >>>                     can be used to create new communication 
>>>>> channel. It
>>>>> >>>                     was found and fixed here: 
>>>>> https://crbug.com/1293191
>>>>> >>>                     <https://crbug.com/1293191>. I guess the two
>>>>> >>>                     features relies on the same mechanism and 
>>>>> Chrome
>>>>> >>>                     might immune as result. Anyway, could you 
>>>>> please
>>>>> >>>                     make sure the behavior is specified and show 
>>>>> how it
>>>>> >>>                     doesn't create a cross-site leak?
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>                 You are correct that the same mechanism
>>>>> >>>                 prevented cross-site information leaks for "both". 
>>>>> In
>>>>> >>>                 other words, thet modal dialog feature doesn't
>>>>> >>>                 propagate, due to the fix for issue 1293191.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>                 :modal is a pseudoclass state that only changes 
>>>>> style
>>>>> >>>                 for a <dialog> element in the same document as the 
>>>>> style
>>>>> >>>                 sheet using :modal. Therefore a cross-origin iframe
>>>>> >>>                 won't be able to change its document's state based 
>>>>> on
>>>>> >>>                 :modal. So I don't see a way that this feature will
>>>>> >>>                 introduce new security or privacy issues. Let me 
>>>>> know if
>>>>> >>>                 this doesn't fully answer your questions.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>                     Filling
>>>>> >>>                     the 
>>>>> https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/
>>>>> >>>                     <
>>>>> https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/> is often
>>>>> >>>                     helpful as well ;-)
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>                     On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 6:51:19 PM UTC+2 
>>>>> Mike
>>>>> >>>                     Taylor wrote:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>                         On 5/26/22 9:35 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:
>>>>> >>>>                         On 5/26/22 2:42 AM, Jihwan Kim wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>                         4. Gecko vendor signal : I set gecko's 
>>>>> signal
>>>>> >>>>>                         to 'Shipped/Shipping' as the
>>>>> >>>>>                         doc(bit.ly/blink-signals
>>>>> >>>>>                         <https://bit.ly/blink-signals>) defines
>>>>> >>>>>                         'Shipped/Shipping' as 'Link to public
>>>>> >>>>>                         documentation or bug/issue'. I'm not sure
>>>>> >>>>>                         which signal would be right if there is 
>>>>> an
>>>>> >>>>>                         open issue.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>                         Thank for this feedback - I can see how 
>>>>> that
>>>>> >>>>                         is confusing. I updated the language to 
>>>>> say
>>>>> >>>>                         "Link to public documentation or bug/issue
>>>>> >>>>                         that demonstrates the issue has shipped 
>>>>> (i.e.,
>>>>> >>>>                         an issue that links to patches that have 
>>>>> been
>>>>> >>>>                         merged, or a comment that a previously
>>>>> >>>>                         disabled feature is not enabled by 
>>>>> default)."
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>                         (this should read "now enabled by default",
>>>>> >>>                         rather than "not"). 🙈
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>                     --
>>>>> >>>                     You received this message because you are 
>>>>> subscribed
>>>>> >>>                     to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> >>>                     To unsubscribe from this group and stop 
>>>>> receiving
>>>>> >>>                     emails from it, send an email to
>>>>> >>>                     [email protected].
>>>>> >>>                     To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> >>>                     
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f75f277a-11ca-4482-9af0-7764f1241eafn%40chromium.org
>>>>> >>>                     <
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f75f277a-11ca-4482-9af0-7764f1241eafn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
>>>>> >.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>         --
>>>>> >>>         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>> >>>         Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> >>>         To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails 
>>>>> from
>>>>> >>>         it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>         To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> >>>         
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/293471ff-f32c-4223-b2cd-994d5d018c59n%40chromium.org
>>>>> >>>         <
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/293471ff-f32c-4223-b2cd-994d5d018c59n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
>>>>> >.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> --
>>>>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> >>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>> send
>>>>> >>> an email to [email protected]
>>>>> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> >>> 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/09a12ad7-8b0d-4c34-87da-f2f08367242cn%40chromium.org
>>>>> >>> <
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/09a12ad7-8b0d-4c34-87da-f2f08367242cn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
>>>>> >.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/bfeccc32-0e8c-86b4-994a-1392b94b081e%40igalia.com
>>>>> .
>>>>> > 
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d1d0560a-88b3-3b26-2101-9fc6043e223a%40igalia.com
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3DcbTVJtque1KL_gqYM4-CY6X99sELS7XB%3DW-rUKZf_5CQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3DcbTVJtque1KL_gqYM4-CY6X99sELS7XB%3DW-rUKZf_5CQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/64389cb0-0a31-4c76-a9ef-aec1cd4bbd26n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to