> > Does our implementation match these new edits?
Generally yes, there are some thing that are not implemented yet, like spread syntax (spec link https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#early-resolution), but this is more like a separate projects rather than part of if() function implementation since it applies to all arbitrary substitution functions. Also it was recently resolved to add numerical comparisons (e.g. '<', '>', etc), see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11104 and https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8376. This can be added at any time later without any breaking changes. On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:16 PM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> wrote: > Does our implementation match these new edits? > On 3/26/25 11:32 AM, 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev wrote: > > Thank you for your replies. > > Some of these changes (which are somewhat significant) have been >> discussed last week, like [1] for a >> concrete example, and the spec hasn't even been updated yet... >> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11500 > > > Tab landed spec edits for that: > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11500#issuecomment-2752840616. > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 4:00 PM Alan Stearns <famuli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Alex, >> >> I trimmed down the quote reply below to point out that Emilio is asking >> for more web developer feedback. That will take time to get as authors >> experiment with the prototype. >> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:10 AM Alex Russell <slightly...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Will second the thanks, Emilio, but will reiterate that Blink's test >>> here isn't WG consensus, but rather web developer feedback. If there's >>> concern among developers that this proposal isn't on the right trajectory, >>> would be good to hear that now. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> >>>> On 2/26/25 9:06 AM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: >>>> > >>>> > However I do think it might be wise to let authors and other CSS >>>> > experts experiment with it and find issues with these features (and >>>> > more importantly, with the design of these features) for a bit >>>> longer. >>>> > As that post says, we've been bit by this in the past, also with >>>> > nesting... >>>> >>>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "blink-dev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >> To view this discussion visit >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAF2G5YuagVxixVxp5H0x14gkA_Q9nir-%2BJ1AHVPkAEsyiQu6FQ%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAF2G5YuagVxixVxp5H0x14gkA_Q9nir-%2BJ1AHVPkAEsyiQu6FQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "blink-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_DEzixOmYXFVR-t7vgQJHpM-6jEdXRQosCqfK0k8stAjA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_DEzixOmYXFVR-t7vgQJHpM-6jEdXRQosCqfK0k8stAjA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_C%2BZV2fdBW0sT4VqV9eqRZpZDqsqFOge_C2Z74vOSF2-Q%40mail.gmail.com.
