LGTM1 On Friday, April 4, 2025 at 4:15:14 AM UTC-7 moo...@google.com wrote:
> Does our implementation match these new edits? > > > Generally yes, there are some thing that are not implemented yet, like > spread syntax (spec link > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#early-resolution), but this is > more like a separate projects rather than part of if() function > implementation since it applies to all arbitrary substitution functions. > > Also it was recently resolved to add numerical comparisons (e.g. '<', '>', > etc), see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11104 and > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8376. This can be added at any > time later without any breaking changes. > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:16 PM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> > wrote: > >> Does our implementation match these new edits? >> On 3/26/25 11:32 AM, 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev wrote: >> >> Thank you for your replies. >> >> Some of these changes (which are somewhat significant) have been >>> discussed last week, like [1] for a >>> concrete example, and the spec hasn't even been updated yet... >>> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11500 >> >> >> Tab landed spec edits for that: >> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11500#issuecomment-2752840616. >> >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 4:00 PM Alan Stearns <famuli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Alex, >>> >>> I trimmed down the quote reply below to point out that Emilio is asking >>> for more web developer feedback. That will take time to get as authors >>> experiment with the prototype. >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:10 AM Alex Russell <slightly...@chromium.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Will second the thanks, Emilio, but will reiterate that Blink's test >>>> here isn't WG consensus, but rather web developer feedback. If there's >>>> concern among developers that this proposal isn't on the right trajectory, >>>> would be good to hear that now. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Alex >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 2/26/25 9:06 AM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > However I do think it might be wise to let authors and other CSS >>>>> > experts experiment with it and find issues with these features (and >>>>> > more importantly, with the design of these features) for a bit >>>>> longer. >>>>> > As that post says, we've been bit by this in the past, also with >>>>> > nesting... >>>>> >>>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "blink-dev" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >>> To view this discussion visit >>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAF2G5YuagVxixVxp5H0x14gkA_Q9nir-%2BJ1AHVPkAEsyiQu6FQ%40mail.gmail.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAF2G5YuagVxixVxp5H0x14gkA_Q9nir-%2BJ1AHVPkAEsyiQu6FQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "blink-dev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >> To view this discussion visit >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_DEzixOmYXFVR-t7vgQJHpM-6jEdXRQosCqfK0k8stAjA%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_DEzixOmYXFVR-t7vgQJHpM-6jEdXRQosCqfK0k8stAjA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/fe2de2fe-928b-4c71-81f8-5fbe0103bad1n%40chromium.org.
