LGTM2 On Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 8:09:13 AM UTC-7 sligh...@chromium.org wrote:
> LGTM1 > > On Friday, April 4, 2025 at 4:15:14 AM UTC-7 moo...@google.com wrote: > >> Does our implementation match these new edits? >> >> >> Generally yes, there are some thing that are not implemented yet, like >> spread syntax (spec link >> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#early-resolution), but this is >> more like a separate projects rather than part of if() function >> implementation since it applies to all arbitrary substitution functions. >> >> Also it was recently resolved to add numerical comparisons (e.g. '<', >> '>', etc), see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11104 and >> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8376. This can be added at >> any time later without any breaking changes. >> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:16 PM Mike Taylor <mike...@chromium.org> wrote: >> > Does our implementation match these new edits? >>> On 3/26/25 11:32 AM, 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev wrote: >>> >> Thank you for your replies. >>> >>> Some of these changes (which are somewhat significant) have been >>>> discussed last week, like [1] for a >>>> concrete example, and the spec hasn't even been updated yet... >>>> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11500 >>> >>> >>> Tab landed spec edits for that: >>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11500#issuecomment-2752840616 >>> . >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 4:00 PM Alan Stearns <famu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Alex, >>>> >>>> I trimmed down the quote reply below to point out that Emilio is asking >>>> for more web developer feedback. That will take time to get as authors >>>> experiment with the prototype. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:10 AM Alex Russell <sligh...@chromium.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Will second the thanks, Emilio, but will reiterate that Blink's test >>>>> here isn't WG consensus, but rather web developer feedback. If there's >>>>> concern among developers that this proposal isn't on the right >>>>> trajectory, >>>>> would be good to hear that now. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Alex >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 2/26/25 9:06 AM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > However I do think it might be wise to let authors and other CSS >>>>>> > experts experiment with it and find issues with these features (and >>>>>> > more importantly, with the design of these features) for a bit >>>>>> longer. >>>>>> > As that post says, we've been bit by this in the past, also with >>>>>> > nesting... >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "blink-dev" group. >>>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >>> >>> >>>> To view this discussion visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAF2G5YuagVxixVxp5H0x14gkA_Q9nir-%2BJ1AHVPkAEsyiQu6FQ%40mail.gmail.com >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAF2G5YuagVxixVxp5H0x14gkA_Q9nir-%2BJ1AHVPkAEsyiQu6FQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "blink-dev" group. >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >>> >>> >>> To view this discussion visit >>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_DEzixOmYXFVR-t7vgQJHpM-6jEdXRQosCqfK0k8stAjA%40mail.gmail.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_DEzixOmYXFVR-t7vgQJHpM-6jEdXRQosCqfK0k8stAjA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/a7e062cb-4e08-43c9-a8a4-bdd6f94cd785n%40chromium.org.
