I think with the 4244bis+target-URI, it will be a lot easier to fulfill what this draft is trying to do.
Provided that we are capable of "marking" the URIs in the target-URI draft that correspond to a retargeting by mapping the URIs to a different URI. On Mar12 2009 17:00 , "Shida Schubert" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Hadriel; > > As far as I know there was no clear consensus on the way forward of > this draft, > and as you may recall, there was as much of an opposition as there was > support > to work on this. > > Only thing I believe we agreed on was that, if we were to discuss > the draft, > we were to use BLISS mailing list until we know what we are doing. > > Regards > Shida > > On 13-Mar-09, at 3:48 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > >> Hi Marianne and BLISS Chairs, >> Why was this submitted as an individual-draft again and not a >> Working-Group draft? >> >> Didn't we have consensus in Dublin to make this a BLISS WG Item? >> >> If we want to make History-Info the new white meat, we have to >> provide a transition mechanism. That transition mechanism can >> either be done differently by every system, or be done the same way. >> >> -hadriel >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of >>> [email protected] >>> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 7:38 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> A new version of the draft-mohali-diversion-history-info is >>> available at >>> the following URL : >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mohali-diversion-history-info- >>> 01.txt >>> >>> Note that interworking between Diversion header and Voicemail URI >>> has been >>> added in addition to interworking from Diversion header to History- >>> Info >>> header. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Marianne. > > _______________________________________________ > BLISS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
