Hi Mary, I am not comparing Diversion header and History-Info header. In fact, I don't care if Diversion header is not standartized. The problem is that it has been implemented and not only by one implementor. I just try to recommend a solution to a real issue towards the standardized solution (like for other cases as H323 interworking). History-Info header has been standardized for many reasons, after many time and discussions. It is the normalized solution and this is not the subject of the draft. The work on 4244bis/target-uri is necessary and good but a separate topic.
Regards, Marianne -----Message d'origine----- De : Mary Barnes [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : vendredi 13 mars 2009 15:21 À : MOHALI Marianne RD-CORE-ISS; [email protected]; Francois Audet Cc : [email protected] Objet : RE: [BLISS] TR: New Version Notificationfordraft-mohali-diversion-history-info-01 Hi Marianne, And, the standardization of this document could well take longer than it will take to complete 4244bis. Per my list of pros/cons, to be correct and useful, this document is effectively standardizing Diversion header, which is actually more work than what's being done in the 4244bis and target-uri docs. So, you're waiting either way. Regards, Mary. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 5:13 AM To: [email protected]; Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BLISS] TR: New Version Notificationfordraft-mohali-diversion-history-info-01 Hi, I don't understand why this is premature. On the contrary, this is late. It is long time that Diversion header is implemented and now there are implementations based on History-Info header (RFC4244)(Here I'm just talking about call frowarding service). RFC4244 will still be as it is and making the History-info header interwork with the Diversion header will still be needed as RFC4244 is implemented. In the other hand, the work in progress on 4244bis/targetURI could takes time and interworking with Diversion header will may be also needed with the "new History-Info". Regards Marianne > -----Original Message----- > From: Francois Audet [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:57 PM > > It is premature to make this a working group draft or publishing it > until we have progressed on 4244bis/targetURI. _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
