Hi, I don't understand why this is premature. On the contrary, this is late. It is long time that Diversion header is implemented and now there are implementations based on History-Info header (RFC4244)(Here I'm just talking about call frowarding service). RFC4244 will still be as it is and making the History-info header interwork with the Diversion header will still be needed as RFC4244 is implemented. In the other hand, the work in progress on 4244bis/targetURI could takes time and interworking with Diversion header will may be also needed with the "new History-Info".
Regards Marianne > -----Original Message----- > From: Francois Audet [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:57 PM > > It is premature to make this a working group draft or publishing it > until we have progressed on 4244bis/targetURI. _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
