Hi Alan,

I think the Shared Appearances extensions of RFC 4235 do not really
match the semantics of SIP Supported:/Require: headers. I'd prefer the
way it is defined right now (Event: dialog;shared). The draft formally
extends the XML schema of RFC 4235 with a few attributes. These are
extensions to an event package, which is what (Event: dialog;shared)
communicates.

Your definition of the usage of the event package parameter sounds fine to me.

Thanks,
Raj

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Alan Johnston <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here's an issue Robert has raised that we should have some discussion on
> before sending this on the IESG.
>
> The Shared Appearance draft defines a "shared" event parameter.
>
> The question is whether this should instead be a SIP feature tag used in a
> Supported and Require header fields.
>
> I've pulled out some text from the draft, RFC 3265, and a summary of how it
> is used.
>
> What do people think?
>
> Thanks,
> Alan
>
> - - - - -
>
> From draft-bliss-shared-appearance:
>
> Section 12.1
>
>  This specification defines a new event parameter 'shared' for the
>  Dialog Package.  When used in a NOTIFY, it indicates that the
>  notifier supports the shared appearance feature.  When used in a
>  PUBLISH, it indicates that the publisher has explicit appearance
>  information contained in the message body.  If not present in a
>  PUBLISH, the Appearance Agent MAY assign an appearance number to any
>  new dialogs in the message body.
>
> From RFC 3265:
>
> 4.4.2. Event Package Parameters
>
>  If parameters are to be used on the "Event" header to modify the
>  behavior of the event package, the syntax and semantics of such
>  headers MUST be clearly defined.
>
> Details on the usage:
>
> - Appearance Agent discovery of non-Shared Appearance UA during
> subscriptions.  A NOTIFY sent without <appearance> elements does not
> necessarily mean the UA does not understand or support the extension, but a
> NOTIFY sent without the Event:dialog;shared does  indicate this.
>
> - Sent by a UA and interpreted by an Appearance Agent to request no
> appearance number be assigned to a dialog (PUBLISH sent without <appearance>
> attribute but containing Event: dialog;shared
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BLISS mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
>
_______________________________________________
BLISS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss

Reply via email to