> On 13 Oct, 2016, at 06:22, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > > I still might quibble, but a trimmed mean makes more sense than just a mean. > > Problem I always have is bloat is biased always towards the end of a test. > Here, > at 1gbit, it took nearly 20 seconds to start going boom. Maybe we need > to invent a new distribution (The bloat distribution? The TCP > distribution)...
Perhaps the 90th percentile would be relevant - the median is simply the 50th percentile. Taking the 90th avoids counting true flukes, but also captures the idea that intermittently high latency is in fact noticeable. - Jonathan Morton _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
