On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:04:37PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > I'm really looking forward to trying them out and reading the upcoming paper. > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/671069/
As a random data point, I tried a single flow from my main server in .no to my backup server in .nl and compared CUBIC (with sch_fq) to BBR (naturally also in sch_fq) on the sender side. The results were quite consistent across runs: - BBR ramped up much quicker than CUBIC. - BBR gave ~10% higher max speed than CUBIC (~680 Mbit/sec on a gigabit link). - CUBIC wavered a bit up and down (~100 Mbit/sec) from the max; BBR stayed put (perhaps 2 Mbit/sec difference) the entire time. http://pastebin.com/0XQaJvD9 for a typical log. I don't have any fancy graphs, sorry :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/ _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
