On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:47:26AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > As a random data point, I tried a single flow from my main server in .no > to my backup server in .nl and compared CUBIC (with sch_fq) to BBR (naturally > also in sch_fq) on the sender side. The results were quite consistent across > runs:
Another datapoint: A friend of mine had a different, worse path (of about 40 ms) and tested with iperf. CUBIC delivered 20.1 Mbit/sec (highly varying). BBR delivered 485 Mbit/sec. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/ _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
